An electrical contractor sued a developer for not paying a debt
An electrical contractor sued a developer for not paying a debt (in
the amount of $35,000) that the developer allegedly owed for work the contractor had performed during construction of a number of houses being built in a residential community by the developer. The two businesses are both located in, and are corporations of, the state of Alaska. The judgment at trial was against the electrical company, which now desires to appeal that ruling.
The court having jurisdiction over the suit for trial would have been?
b. The plaintiff is? The defendant is?
c. When appealed, the appellant is?
d. Grounds permitting reversal by an appellate court would be
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code “Newclient”
The post An electrical contractor sued a developer for not paying a debt appeared first on Superb Professors.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.