Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 15% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? Method First Cost M&O Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM S-120.000 $-70,000 $2.000 2 years $.460.000 $ 25,000 $25.000 4 years The present worth for the DDM method is SL The present worth for the LS method is $ The Click to select method is selected
PLACE YOUR ORDER TO GET STARTEDThe post Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with t appeared first on Essay Gem.
Case study one page Case study one page Case study one page Case study one…
Business Calculus quiz that is 10 questions and has an hour time limit. Must be…
Write a 175- to 265-word response to the following: What constitutes “robust interoperability,†and what…
For this News Briefing Quest task , pick and analyze a U.S. political news article…
ACC 610 Milestone TwoGuidelines and Rubric This is the secondof three milestone assignments that will…
Please answer the questions in the attachment. I have sent you the required materials. Send…