Superb Professors

Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, but response is cursory, ambiguous, or lacking necessary detail

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not identify and describe the institution where the new program would be implemented

Needs Assessment: Potential

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Assesses the organizational design for potential program development

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Assesses the organizational design for potential program development, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not assess the organizational design for potential program development

Needs Assessment: Disparities

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Assesses community needs in terms of healthcare disparities, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not assess community needs in terms of healthcare disparities

Needs Assessment: Cultural Competence

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Assesses the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Assesses the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit, but response is cursory, vague, or inaccurate

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not assess the organization’s healthcare programs in terms of the level of cultural competence they exhibit

Needs Assessment: Strategy

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Recommends an appropriate and logical programmatic strategy, based on results of assessments

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Recommends a programmatic strategy, but strategy is inappropriate or illogical or is not based on results of assessments

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not recommend a programmatic strategy

Needs Assessment: Alignment

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Logically assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Assesses programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines, but assessment is cursory, vague, or illogical

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not assess programmatic strategy for alignment with ethical guidelines

Outcomes: Anticipated Outcomes

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Articulates the anticipated end result and explains how the program will produce results within the organization, but response is cursory or vague

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not articulate the anticipated end result and does not explain how the program will produce results for the organization

Outcomes: Fit

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization

Points:

4.73 (6.3%)

Describes how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization, but response is cursory, vague, or illogical

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not describe how the program will fit into and interact with the rest of the organization

Outcomes: Other Areas

Points:

6.75 (9%)

Assesses the impact, or lack thereof, of the program on other areas of the organization or the community, explaining why

---

 

. .

---

---

The post Identifies and describes the institution where the new program would be implemented, including institution name, location, focus, and other pertinent demographic identifiers appeared first on My Nursing Paper.

"Order a Custom Paper on Similar Assignment! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount"